The White House is defending Press Secretary Katie Zacharia after questions arose regarding her legal credentials. President Trump announced her appointment last week, identifying her as an attorney, and Zacharia has also referred to herself as a lawyer. However, when asked Tuesday which state bar she had passed, Zacharia stated she had taken the exam “When I moved to China.” Records show she is not currently registered to practice law in any state where she has resided.
White House communications director Steven Cheung asserted Zacharia is “uniquely qualified and whip smart to help inform the American people.” Zacharia stated she practiced international transaction law, with appropriate credentials, and told The New York Times she was advised by Pepperdine University’s president to identify herself as a lawyer, but not an attorney, when first appearing on cable news. She also claimed a misunderstanding regarding her response about the bar exam, stating she believed the reporter had asked where she was after law school.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Zacharia took the California bar exam after graduating from Pepperdine in 2011 but did not pass. She moved to Beijing around that time due to her husband’s job and worked as an associate at Zhong Lun Law Firm from 2011-2013, though only Chinese citizens can be licensed to practice law in China. In February 2023, Zacharia stated on a radio program she had worked as outside counsel for the International Finance Corporation.
Campaign for Accountability filed a complaint with the California State Bar Association Wednesday, seeking an investigation into whether Zacharia repeatedly held herself out as an attorney without a license, which California law treats as a crime.
Our reading is that the White House is attempting to downplay discrepancies in the Press Secretary’s stated legal qualifications. The administration’s defense, emphasizing Zacharia’s overall competence and a claimed misunderstanding regarding the bar exam, appears to be a strategic effort to manage the narrative. The conflicting accounts, Zacharia’s initial claim of being an attorney, her later explanation of practicing international transaction law, and the admission of not passing the California bar, suggest a degree of obfuscation.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy