Democratic senators are investigating Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over allegations he falsely testified before Congress regarding a 2019 trip to Samoa with Children’s Health Defense. Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland are seeking records from CHD related to the trip, which occurred months before a measles outbreak in Samoa killed 83 people, primarily children under five. The lawmakers allege Kennedy misrepresented the purpose of the trip during his January 2025 confirmation hearings, stating it had “nothing to do with vaccines.” However, a letter Kennedy wrote to the Samoan prime minister prior to the trip, obtained through open records requests, explicitly discussed studying the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and used the terms “vaccine” or “vaccination” eight times. The prime minister responded by inviting Kennedy to assess MMR vaccines in Samoa.
Wyden and Alsobrooks expressed deep concern over Kennedy’s actions, citing the tragic deaths of unvaccinated children in both Samoa and the United States during measles outbreaks. They stated their intent to hold Kennedy accountable for any false statements made to Congress, which they characterized as a crime undermining the Senate’s constitutional duties. Kennedy has denied allegations that his presence in Samoa emboldened anti-vaccine activists or discouraged vaccination, asserting he made no public statements on the topic. The investigation seeks all documents related to the 2019 trip, aiming to determine whether Kennedy’s testimony was accurate and to assess the potential harm caused by his actions.
Our reading is that this investigation represents a potential escalation of scrutiny surrounding Secretary Kennedy Jr.’s past statements and actions. The senators’ focus on a discrepancy between his confirmation testimony and prior written communication suggests a deliberate attempt to establish a pattern of misrepresentation. The invocation of a “crime undermining the Senate’s constitutional duties” indicates the seriousness with which they view the matter, and a willingness to pursue formal consequences.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy