Former Chancellor Rachel Reeves has publicly stated her belief that the UK’s future lies within the European Union, marking a departure from the Labour Party’s current stance of making Brexit work. Reeves argued that Brexit has left the UK “poorer, weaker and less secure” in a Sunday Times article, and welcomed debate on the UK’s relationship with Europe. This position aligns with Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who has also called for an honest discussion about the future relationship with the EU, but contrasts with the Conservative Party’s insistence there is no desire to revisit the Brexit debate.
While Labour’s 2024 manifesto ruled out a return to free movement, single market membership, or a customs union, Reeves emphasized the need to “make the argument, demonstrate tangible benefits and to get the next steps right” for re-entry. She specifically highlighted the importance of securing a youth mobility scheme and entry into the EU’s Security Action for Europe (SAFE) scheme at the upcoming UK-EU summit, noting a defence pact last May paved the way for UK companies to participate in SAFE-funded projects.
Burnham has indicated any fundamental changes to post-Brexit arrangements would require a public mandate, likely at the next general election due by 2029. Reform UK’s Nigel Farage has stated there is no mandate for closer EU ties. Reeves defended her record in office, advocating for bolder infrastructure projects and acknowledging the risks and benefits of AI.
Our reading is that a significant figure within the Labour Party is publicly pushing for a reconsideration of Brexit, despite the party’s stated position. Reeves’ statements, coupled with Burnham’s prior comments, suggest a growing internal debate about the UK’s relationship with the EU. The emphasis on securing specific agreements at the upcoming summit indicates a desire for concrete steps towards closer ties, even if a full return to previous arrangements is not immediately feasible.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy