James Copenhaver, 76, died Wednesday at Allegheny Health Network’s West Penn hospital in Pittsburgh, two years after being shot during a 2024 campaign rally for then-candidate Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Copenhaver was struck in the arm and abdomen when a 20-year-old gunman opened fire from a rooftop, also wounding David Dutch and killing Corey Comperatore. While the Allegheny County medical examiner confirmed the death, He had undergone multiple surgeries, including a colon transection, and suffered lingering kidney damage and loss of feeling in his leg, described as “debilitating, grievous, permanent and life altering” in a lawsuit filed in June against the federal government, alleging failures by the Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security to provide adequate security.
Copenhaver and his wife, Marianne, claimed in the lawsuit that the security failures led to his severe injuries. The family stated that Copenhaver was a devoted husband, father, and grandfather, and a veteran who proudly served in the armed forces. Former President Trump called Copenhaver “a true American Patriot” in a social media post, praising his bravery and positive spirit. The House Republican Conference also expressed sadness at his passing, noting his strength and perseverance. The White House did not immediately comment.
Ken Silva, a journalist who wrote a book about the assassination attempt, confirmed Copenhaver had been dealing with complications from the wounds. The incident prompted the resignation of then-Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle following testimony before the House Oversight Committee regarding security failures at the rally. GOP lawmakers have recently expressed concern about new revelations regarding the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks.
Our reading is that this death, while tragic, is now prompting renewed scrutiny of an event already marked by security concerns and political fallout. The differing emphases in media coverage, military service versus lingering injuries, the lawsuit versus details of the shooting, suggest a struggle to frame the narrative. The mention of “new revelations” regarding the shooter, coupled with GOP concern, indicates this story is not simply a remembrance, but a potential reopening of old wounds and investigations.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy