Illustrators are raising concerns about generative artificial intelligence startups training their models on artists’ work without permission. This practice has sparked legal battles and a debate over whether compensating artists is enough to gain their acceptance of the technology.
For years, illustrators have been sounding the alarm regarding generative AI startups utilizing their artwork to train AI models without obtaining consent. Artists argue this constitutes theft. In response, proponents of generative AI contend that such training is essential for the technology’s advancement.
This disagreement has resulted in ongoing legal challenges. The core issue revolves around whether artists should be compensated for the use of their work in training these AI systems and if compensation alone will resolve the ethical concerns surrounding AI-generated art.
We don't rate truth. We strip the spin and show you which perspectives covered the story. You decide.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy