Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy has ordered an investigation into whether Mary Peltola’s Democratic Senate campaign coordinated with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) to recruit a third candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan, to potentially draw votes from Republican incumbent Dan S. Sullivan. The inquiry follows a New York Times report detailing alleged efforts to influence Alaska’s ranked-choice Senate race by adding candidates intended to confuse voters and dilute support for the incumbent. Dunleavy stated the investigation will determine if any laws were violated and if criminal or civil action is warranted, emphasizing that deliberately misleading voters undermines election integrity.
The New York Times reported that Peltola’s campaign and the DSCC discussed identifying and encouraging other individuals named Dan Sullivan to run, a strategy internally referred to as a “ballot composition project.” The Alaska Division of Elections previously investigated similar concerns in June. Peltola’s campaign and the DSCC both deny direct involvement in recruiting Daniel J. Sullivan, but the Times report cites interviews with former campaign staff and documents indicating coordination. Senator Dan S. Sullivan has characterized the alleged scheme as a “scandal” and called for accountability.
The investigation comes as Republicans express concerns about unexpectedly competitive races in traditionally safe states. In South Carolina, Senator Darline Graham is facing a tighter-than-expected contest against Democratic nominee Annie Andrews, prompting a visit from Donald Trump. The Alaska race is considered one of the tightest midterm contests, with analysts closely watching the outcome. Previous attempts by Republicans to remove Daniel J. Sullivan from the ballot have been unsuccessful, but the state is now proceeding with a formal investigation into the alleged recruitment efforts.
Our reading is that Governor Dunleavy’s investigation reflects a serious escalation of accusations surrounding the Alaska Senate race. The allegations, detailed in the New York Times and previously reported by Fact Refinery, suggest a deliberate attempt to manipulate the ranked-choice voting system, and the governor’s decision to launch a formal inquiry indicates he views these claims as potentially damaging to election integrity. The differing media coverage highlights the partisan nature of the accusations, with some outlets focusing on the “scandal” while others emphasize the impact on the election process.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy