Shane Gillis's SNL Monologue Draws Criticism for Comments on Women's Gym Attire

Comedian Shane Gillis’s Saturday Night Live monologue sparked controversy after he remarked he “didn’t know women just dress like whores now” at the gym, drawing criticism from actor Dan Levy and online backlash. Gillis made the comment while discussing women’s workout attire, specifically noting “neon, artificial-vape colored” shorts and a perceived prohibition on men looking at women wearing them. Levy responded with an Instagram video arguing that attributing women’s clothing choices to promiscuity is misogynistic and contributes to a culture that enables sexual assault, stating, “Women wearing short shorts at the gym does not make them whores. It makes the men calling them whores misogynists.”

The monologue also drew attention in the context of allegations of sexual assault at Cornell University, with some connecting Gillis’s comments to the ongoing conversation surrounding the case. Writer Jessica Valenti suggested Gillis was intentionally responding to the national conversation about sexual assault with his remarks. Gillis, who was previously fired from SNL in 2019 after past controversial comments surfaced, hosted the show for the third time on Saturday.

Left-leaning outlets emphasized the criticism of Gillis’s comments as misogynistic and potentially contributing to a harmful environment for women, highlighting Levy’s strong condemnation and the connection to the Cornell case. Right-leaning coverage focused on the outrage from the left, framing Levy as having “melted down” over the jokes and noting Gillis’s history of being “canceled” for controversial material. Both sides reported Gillis’s comments verbatim and the lack of immediate response from SNL or Gillis’s representatives.

Where they differ

• NBC News framed the monologue as drawing “outpouring of backlash” and focused on the criticism from Dan Levy and the connection to the Cornell case.
• The Blaze emphasized the outrage from the left, characterizing Dan Levy’s response as a “meltdown” and highlighting Gillis’s past controversies and subsequent return to SNL.
• The Blaze used more emotionally charged language, such as “melts down,” while NBC News used more neutral terms like “criticized.”

What is not yet known

• Whether SNL or Gillis will respond to the criticism.
• The full extent of the impact of the monologue on public discourse.

Background

• Shane Gillis was previously removed from SNL in 2019 due to controversial comments surfacing [Fact Refinery, 2026-10-06].
• Cornell University is currently undergoing an independent review led by Sally Yates regarding its handling of sexual harassment and assault allegations, prompted by a 2024 incident at a fraternity house [Fact Refinery, 2026-10-06].
• SNL is a long-running American late-night sketch comedy television program [background knowledge].
• The concept of “cancel culture”, public figures facing repercussions for past or present controversial statements, is a recurring theme in public discourse [background knowledge].

Our reading

Our reading is that the controversy surrounding Gillis’s monologue is not simply about the joke itself, but about its timing and the existing conversations surrounding sexual assault, particularly the situation at Cornell. The differing coverage, with left-leaning outlets focusing on the misogyny and right-leaning outlets emphasizing the outrage, highlights a familiar pattern of polarized reactions to controversial comedy. The article strongly suggests this incident will not resolve quickly, given the lack of immediate response from SNL or Gillis.

What to watch

• Whether SNL or Gillis issue a statement addressing the criticism, and the content of that statement [article text: “What is not yet known…Whether SNL or Gillis will respond to the criticism”].
• The findings of Sally Yates’s independent review at Cornell University, and whether they influence the university’s response to the protests and allegations [Fact Refinery, 2026-10-06].
• Any further public response from Dan Levy or other prominent figures regarding Gillis’s comments [article text: “drawing criticism from actor Dan Levy”].

Was this useful? 👍 0 👎 0

---

Read the original coverage