Passengers who play loud music on buses in England could face fines of up to £100 as part of a government effort to curb antisocial behaviour on public transport. The new powers, introduced earlier this year, allow local authorities to issue fixed penalties for offences including loud music, littering, and vaping. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander stated that small changes in behaviour “can make a massive difference to people’s experience on public transport.” The government clarified that bus drivers will not be responsible for enforcement, with authorised officers, including Transport Safety Officers and the Police, handling incidents.
A national campaign, “share the carriage, not the noise,” is also being launched to encourage rail passengers to use headphones. This aims to create a “clear, consistent message across the network” and end the “patchwork” of approaches previously used by different rail operators. The phenomenon of playing music without headphones, sometimes referred to as “loudcasting” or “sodcasting”, has been widely disliked, with polls from Ofcom, YouGov, and Transport for London (TfL) demonstrating broad public disapproval.
Maryam Eslamdoust, general secretary of the TSSA transport union, welcomed the crackdown on antisocial behaviour but urged the government to also address the “violence, threats and abuse” faced by passengers and transport workers, calling for an increased budget for the British Transport Police. Michael Solomon Williams from the Campaign for Better Transport noted that antisocial behaviour can deter people from using public transport, particularly those with accessibility needs.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham stated, “We’ve all been on the train when someone starts blasting music or videos from their phone. It gets on your nerves and can quickly spoil the journey.” Existing powers already allow for removal from a train or a fine of up to £1,000 for those who refuse to comply with requests to lower the volume.
Our reading is that the government is attempting to address a widely recognised nuisance on public transport through increased enforcement powers, while simultaneously framing the issue as part of a broader effort to improve passenger experience. The differing media coverage, one outlet highlighting the punitive aspect and another the wider scope, suggests a degree of political positioning around the announcement. The emphasis on a national campaign and “clear messaging” indicates a desire to move beyond inconsistent local approaches.
Read the original coverage
💬 Comments
📜 Comment Policy