Google Suspended From Finnish Data Center Projects After Illegally Clear-Cutting 250,000 Trees

Google has been ordered to temporarily halt work on data center projects in Muhos and Otanmäki, Finland, after the company illegally clear-cut an estimated 250,000 trees, covering 816 acres, before completing required environmental impact assessments. The deforestation, part of a $17 billion AI infrastructure project, has sparked widespread outcry in Finland, with residents reporting displaced wildlife, including wolves entering villages, and concerns about the environmental impact on local waterways. Google’s Finland country manager, Antti Järvinen, apologized, stating the company acted on its understanding of the legislation at the time. The Finnish Licensing and Supervision Authority (LVV) issued the stop-work order earlier this month. The project has drawn criticism from former US President Donald Trump, who has urged Google to build the centers in the United States. Residents of Muhos have expressed anger over the method of clearing, describing it as “American style” and calling for Google to address past environmental damage to the area, including the decline of the local salmon population. The data center push is expected to be a key issue in the upcoming Finnish elections in April. Brown water runoff from the site is reportedly flowing into a stream that feeds the Oulujoki River. The operation took place despite Finland attracting data centers due to its cool climate, geopolitical stability, and available land. Google’s project subsidiary, Tuike Finland Oy, was given a deadline of October 23 to suspend all operations.

Where they differ

• The New York Post emphasized the impact on wildlife, specifically wolves entering villages due to habitat loss, while Mother Jones focused more on the scale of the deforestation and the broader implications for Finland’s environment.
• Mother Jones highlighted the connection to Finland’s broader push to attract data centers and the potential impact on energy prices and the upcoming election, whereas the New York Post focused on resident concerns about Russian aggression.
• The New York Post reported the investment as $15 billion, while Mother Jones reported $17 billion.

What is not yet known

• The long-term environmental consequences of the deforestation, beyond the immediate impact on wildlife and waterways, remain unclear.
• The extent to which Google will address the concerns of local residents and provide restitution for past environmental damage is not yet established.

Was this useful? 👍 0 👎 0

---

Read the original coverage