Federal Trade Court Invalidates Trump Administration's 10% Global Tariff

A federal trade court ruled on Wednesday that the 10% global tariff imposed by President Donald Trump in February is illegal. The U.S. Court of International Trade, in a decision by a three-judge panel, found that the president exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) when he applied the tariff to most imports. The ruling comes after the Supreme Court earlier struck down a separate set of broad levies known as the "Liberation Day" tariffs.

The tariffs at issue were put in place just days after the Supreme Court's decision against the previous round. According to court documents, the administration argued that the tariffs were necessary to address national security concerns and to protect domestic industries. However, the panel concluded that the IEEPA does not grant the president the power to impose such sweeping tariffs on a global scale without specific congressional authorization.

The decision represents a significant legal setback for the Trump administration's trade policy agenda. The court's order effectively blocks enforcement of the 10% tariff on goods from countries not otherwise subject to separate trade actions. The ruling was reported by multiple outlets, with left-leaning sources emphasizing the court's finding that the president acted beyond his legal powers, while a right-leaning source highlighted that this was the second time the judiciary had struck down a broad tariff attempt by the administration.

The administration has not yet announced whether it will appeal the ruling. Legal experts noted that the case could proceed to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. The White House press office did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The decision may have immediate implications for importers and businesses that had been paying the tariff since February, as they could seek refunds or adjustments.

The court's ruling did not address other tariffs imposed under different legal authorities, such as those on specific countries or products. The global tariff was one component of a broader trade strategy that has faced multiple legal challenges. The outcome underscores the ongoing tension between executive authority and congressional power over trade policy, a debate that has intensified during the current administration.

有帮助吗？ 👍 0 👎 0

---

阅读原始报道